Sustain.Life has been acquired by Workiva, the world’s leading cloud platform for assured, integrated reporting.
Learn more

Is there a difference between net-zero and carbon neutral?

June 7, 2024

They refer to a balance of emissions, with one important distinction.

blue carbon texture

Concerns continue to grow around the staggering impact of carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gasses (GHGs) on the climate. More regulatory bodies are implementing regulations to help curb the concentration of GHGs in the atmosphere. Why? Because global warming threatens business stability—supply chains, customer segments, investment risk—and the earth as a whole.   

Find out how your company can set (and achieve) a net-zero target

Request a demo
Sustain.Life Leaf Logo

Independent of regulation, many businesses are compelled by traditional market drivers—investors, competitors, and customers—to manage their carbon emissions (aka carbon footprint). Companies have been gravitating toward carbon neutrality, especially in the short term, when, in reality, net-zero should be the only acceptable solution. 

What’s the difference between net-zero and carbon neutral? 

Although the terms “net-zero” and “carbon neutral” both refer to the balance of emitted GHGs with avoided or removed emissions, the distinguishing factor between the two claims hinges on compensated emissions (aka offsets). A business can claim carbon neutrality by measuring its emissions and then offsetting the balance through financed projects outside of its value chain, without actually reducing its own emissions.

Net-zero, on the other hand, compels companies to more meaningfully reduce value chain emissions. Net-zero was formally defined in late 2021 by the Science Based Targets Initiative’s Corporate Net-Zero Standard. The standard states that net-zero must be achieved by abating at least 90% of emissions and that the remaining 10% may be reduced through permanent removals in a target year.

SBTi has yet to define the types of removals that will be acceptable and it should not be assumed that traditional offsets available today will be acceptable. In short, carbon neutrality means that you can compensate for your emissions (again, typically with offsets), while net-zero requires abatement of your emissions—you have to actually get rid of them through efficiency, electrification, renewables, and other means.  

And then, of course, there is “zero emissions,” which is essentially a pipedream, because it’s an absolute elimination of all emissions from your operation. This ambitious goal does not allow for any financed removal and requires technology that has yet to exist at scale.

Comparison between Carbon neutral and Net-zero

Aspect Carbon Neutral Net-Zero
Definition Balancing emitted carbon with an equivalent amount of offsetting or removal (e.g., through carbon credits). Must be achieved by abating at least 90% of emissions and that the remaining 10% may be reduced through permanent removals in a target year.
Emissions Typically focuses on direct (scope 1) and indirect (scope 2) emissions. Covers all scopes of emissions: direct (scope 1), indirect (scope 2), and value chain (scope 3).
Reduction vs. offset Allows for a significant proportion of emissions to be offset through carbon credits. Prioritizes actual reduction of emissions with minimal reliance on offsets, focusing on systemic changes.
Long-term goal Often seen as an intermediate step toward more comprehensive climate goals. Represents a more holistic and ambitious goal of fundamentally transforming operations to eliminate emissions.
Verification Can be verified through standards such as PAS 2060, which focuses on the credibility of offsetting projects. Requires adherence to stringent frameworks like the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi), ensuring emissions reductions align with global climate goals.
Typical action Organizations purchasing carbon credits to offset their calculated emissions. Companies restructuring their entire operations, supply chains, and energy usage to minimize emissions at the source.
Timeframe Achievable in a shorter time frame due to the reliance on offsets. Often a longer-term objective due to the need for significant operational and structural changes.
Business impact Can be achieved without major changes to business operations, making it more accessible. Requires comprehensive changes in business practices, potentially leading to innovation and new efficiencies.
Public perception Sometimes viewed with skepticism due to reliance on offsets, which may not always represent permanent reductions. Generally viewed more favorably as it implies a serious commitment to reducing actual emissions.
Examples Microsoft achieving carbon neutrality by purchasing renewable energy certificates and carbon offsets. IKEA committing to becoming climate positive by 2030, focusing on reducing more emissions than the company emits.

Reduction vs. offsetting 

Companies with net-zero targets, by definition, strive to limit global warming to below 1.5°C to avoid the most catastrophic and irreversible impacts of climate change. Go one step further, and you’re in carbon-negative (aka climate positive) territory. This is not an easy target but is achievable, as demonstrated by the first and only carbon-negative nation: Bhutan. 72% of the country is covered by forests, which absorb more than 6 million tons of carbon every year—more than enough to counter the 1.5 million tons of emitted CO2. Thanks to Bhutan’s renewable energy exports, and the fact that it’s small and not industrialized means that no other country is feasibly able to achieve a carbon-negative state.  

How carbon offsetting works

In nature, during photosynthesis, trees regulate and absorb the amount of carbon dioxide in the air and store it in their biomass, specifically bark. In this way, forests are considered one of the most significant carbon sinks, outsized only by the ocean.

On paper, companies can reduce the impact of carbon emissions by investing in projects that store or reduce carbon. Typically, when you purchase a carbon offset, the money is used to support an existing emissions reduction project. In addition to tree planting, reforestation, and forest preservation, they can also purchase carbon credits for projects that diminish fossil fuels in other ways, for instance, “replacement of coal cookstoves with ones powered by renewable energy in India or Asia,” wind farms, or better farming methods.

Learn more about carbon offsetting.

The path to net-zero emissions and carbon neutrality 

To balance your emissions budget, you must first know where you stand by calculating an emissions baseline, a process known as greenhouse gas accounting, emissions accounting, or, colloquially, carbon accounting. The gold standard for corporate emissions accounting is the Greenhouse Gas Protocol (GHG Protocol), a framework to define and translate business activities into emissions figures.  

With over 196 parties pledged to the Paris Agreement, the next step is to decarbonize by lowering consumption, electrifying, and transitioning to renewables. So far, the European Union, Japan, South Korea, and 110 other countries have pledged to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050. China has pledged to reach that goal by 2060. Some of the biggest polluters in the world, including Indonesia (coal’s biggest exporter), China (the largest crude importer), and the U.S. (the largest producer and consumer of gas and oil), have a larger gap to fill on the road to becoming carbon neutral.   

We’ll see more legislation around emissions disclosure to achieve these national goals, like the SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rule, California’s Climate Corporate Accountability Act, and the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). Businesses will also incur financial penalties for failing to meet standards, like the U.S. Methane Reduction Action Plan, which targets methane, a GHG 25 times more powerful than CO2.  

To this end, massive companies like Amazon, Microsoft, and Verizon have taken the Climate Pledge. Still, it’ll take every type of business, including small- and medium-sized ones, to make a dent in the emissions required to keep our planet on track.


1. Science Based Targets, “The Corporate Net-Zero Standard,” Accessed June 7, 2024

2. GVI, “How Bhutan became a carbon-negative country,” Accessed June 7, 2024

2. United Nations Climate Change, “What is the Paris Agreement?,” Accessed June 7, 2024

4. Statista, “The World's Biggest Coal Exporters,” Accessed June 7, 2024

5. Statista, “Leading crude oil importers worldwide in 2022,” Accessed June 7, 2024

6. U.S. Energy Information Administration, “What countries are the top producers and consumers of oil?,” Accessed June 7, 2024

7. California Legislative Information, “SB-260 Climate Corporate Accountability Act,” Accessed June 7, 2024

8. European Commission, “Sustainable finance package,” Accessed June 7, 2024

9. The White House, “Fact Sheet: President Biden Tackles Methane Emissions, Spurs Innovations, and Supports Sustainable Agriculture to Build a Clean Energy Economy and Create Jobs,”,across%20the%20country. Accessed June 7, 2024

Editorial statement
At Sustain.Life, our goal is to provide the most up-to-date, objective, and research-based information to help readers make informed decisions. Written by practitioners and experts, articles are grounded in research and experience-based practices. All information has been fact-checked and reviewed by our team of sustainability professionals to ensure content is accurate and aligns with current industry standards. Articles contain trusted third-party sources that are either directly linked to the text or listed at the bottom to take readers directly to the source.
Alyssa Rade
Alyssa Rade is the chief sustainability officer at Sustain.Life. She has over ten years of corporate sustainability experience and guides Sustain.Life’s platform features.
Constanze Duke
Constanze Duke is a director of sustainability at Sustain.Life and leads the company’s technical practice. She began working in sustainability in 2007 and has worked through sustainability’s dramatic evolution into a multi-faceted discipline.
The takeaway

Although the terms “net-zero” and “carbon neutral” both refer to the balance of emitted GHGs with avoided or removed emissions, the distinguishing factor between carbon neutral vs net zero claims hinges on compensated emissions (aka offsets).