VIDEO: Climate homicide theory & $38 trillion climate loss

April 25, 2024

The Week in Sustainability – April 22–26, 2024

Deforestation landscape

Forecasting economic losses: The global toll of climate change

The latest study published in Nature unveils alarming predictions regarding the economic repercussions of climate change. While discussions about environmental impacts have been ongoing, this study provides concrete figures, projecting a staggering annual loss of $38 trillion by 2049. The forecasted reduction in global income, estimated at approximately 19% over the next 25 years, highlights the profound consequences awaiting humanity.

As the world grapples with shifting environmental conditions, it's evident that these economic losses will disproportionately affect the poorest nations, exacerbating existing inequalities. Regions like the southeastern United States and southern Europe are expected to bear the brunt of these impacts, with even traditionally affluent countries facing significant income reductions.

The study underscores the interconnectedness of environmental changes and economic stability. Factors such as rising temperatures, erratic weather patterns, and agricultural disruptions contribute to this bleak economic outlook. From diminished crop yields to labor productivity challenges, the effects of climate change permeate various sectors, posing immense challenges to global prosperity.

Despite the grim projections, there's still a glimmer of hope in emission mitigation efforts. Investing in measures to reduce emissions is crucial in mitigating future economic losses and safeguarding global well-being. While some consequences of climate change are inevitable due to past emissions, proactive measures taken today can help minimize their severity.

Climate homicide: Holding oil companies accountable

The term "climate homicide" has emerged as a poignant descriptor for the lethal consequences of climate change, prompting discussions about legal accountability. Legal scholars, notably from the Harvard Environmental Law Review, are proposing a novel approach: holding oil companies accountable for the deaths caused by their contributions to climate change.

Drawing parallels to past cases against industries like tobacco, the argument for legal action against oil and gas companies gains traction. These companies, aware of the environmental consequences of their activities, have often downplayed or denied the science to prioritize profit. The proposed legal framework seeks to address this negligence, aiming to bring accountability to a global scale.

While the concept of climate homicide represents a significant shift in legal discourse, challenges abound in constructing a compelling legal argument. Unlike direct harms associated with products like tobacco, attributing specific deaths to fossil fuel extraction and combustion presents complexities. Nevertheless, there's growing momentum behind the pursuit of justice, with discussions centering on potential charges ranging from involuntary manslaughter to negligent homicide.

As this legal debate unfolds, the prospect of holding oil companies accountable for their role in climate change sparks both hope and skepticism. While the path to justice may be fraught with challenges, the conversation itself marks a pivotal moment in the fight against climate injustice.

By addressing both the economic and legal dimensions of climate change, it becomes clear that urgent action is needed to mitigate its far-reaching consequences. Whether through emission reduction efforts or legal accountability measures, collective action is imperative to navigate the challenges posed by a rapidly changing climate.

Future-proof your business—decarbonize now

Request a demo
Sustain.Life Leaf Logo


1. AP News, "New study calculates climate change’s economic bite will hit about $38 trillion a year by 2049." Accessed: April 17, 2024

2. GRIST, "Taking Big Oil to court for ‘climate homicide’ isn’t as far-fetched as it sounds." Accessed: April 19, 2024

Editorial statement
At Sustain.Life, our goal is to provide the most up-to-date, objective, and research-based information to help readers make informed decisions. Written by practitioners and experts, articles are grounded in research and experience-based practices. All information has been fact-checked and reviewed by our team of sustainability professionals to ensure content is accurate and aligns with current industry standards. Articles contain trusted third-party sources that are either directly linked to the text or listed at the bottom to take readers directly to the source.
Hannah Asofsky
Hannah Asofsky is a sustainability data analyst at Sustain.Life.
Alyssa Rade
Alyssa Rade is the chief sustainability officer at Sustain.Life. She has over ten years of corporate sustainability experience and guides Sustain.Life’s platform features.
The takeaway
Listen on Apple Podcasts